🔗 Share this article

Iran is ready to resume nuclear talks with the United States as long as it is approached with "respect" and "respect", Tehran's foreign minister has declared.

Abbas Araghchi said exclusively dialogue was effective, and disclosed new appeals had come from intermediaries to reopen discussions with the Trump administration. He asserted Iran had zero secret atomic facilities, and Iran was not yet able to permit the UN nuclear inspectorate to inspect attacked atomic facilities for protective measures.

Navigating a Complex Route

Araghchi is walking a challenging course since Iran aims to avoid be perceived to be acting from a position of vulnerability, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had arisen more powerful in military terms and mentally from the joint assault on its atomic facilities in June.

He was speaking at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an inalienable right to enrich uranium domestically that it will always maintain" – the primary cause of the deadlock in the previous talks.

Previous Talks Unexpectedly Concluded

The earlier sessions of negotiations between the US and Iran were brought to an abrupt and bitter termination on 12 June when Israel, with American backing, attacked Tehran's atomic facilities in a two-week conflict that concluded with Donald Trump claiming the locations had been destroyed. Following this, Western states employed their authority to reinstate UN-wide sanctions, but Iran insists they have not had a substantial consequence.

Perfect Agreement Proposed

Iran's diplomats said they felt they had attained a "perfect agreement" to the enrichment issue in prior discussions, when it was decided an local partnership with Washington's engagement could refine atomic fuel. Both sides would have been able to assert triumph since domestic enrichment would have continued and the US could be assured that Iran's nuclear programme was entirely non-military.

It had not been agreed in the discussions that American atomic experts could function on Iranian soil, but that was a reasonable assumption of the consortium proposal. Representatives stated three times they had reached agreement with Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff only for the deal to disintegrate due to "opponents in the US".

Present Status

Iranian officials stated the consortium offer was now off the table, but it seems quite possible the proposal could be resurrected in some form if discussions reopen.

Trump in recent days stated he had been getting signals that Iran sought to restart talks, but confidentially Tehran representatives state they are not yet getting consistent overtures from Washington either directly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as Qatar, Egypt, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been criticized of passivity in the wake of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Iran states diplomacy is not part of a spectacle.

Diplomatic Standpoint

In his speech to the conference, aimed to portray the US as a controlling nation that abuses the notion of global regulations, Araghchi declared the 12-day war showed the dispute could not be resolved by combat operations. He asserted the attacks commenced with a Washington's ultimatum for an complete Tehran capitulation and concluded with an absolute demand for a ceasefire.

Iran is certain the first strikes by Israel were mounted with complete American awareness and collaboration, making trust challenging to reestablish.

Dialogue Continues the Primary Resolution

Araghchi declared: "It was not Iran that had deserted negotiations; it was America and the Western nations that had repeatedly tried to dictate their will during the discussions. Diplomacy can still be viable and stays the primary answer to address disagreements, but its standards, rules and tenets must be followed."

"If they speak to the Iranian people with the tone of respect and honor, they will receive a response in the same tone."

Repair and Reconstruction

In what is described by Tehran representatives as the conflict of recovery and rebuilding, the foreign minister stated he was confident Iran's security strengths "have significantly improved than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been reestablished. We learned many lessons from this conflict; we have identified our personal limitations and the weaknesses of the opponent."

He continued: "We successfully passed this conflict. Our atomic expertise, which they aimed to eliminate, continues to exist. The facilities and gear, if eliminated, will be reconstructed; what is crucial is the will of the citizens of Tehran and then the national cohesion that they sought to undermine, but were unable to destroy. The nation of Iran have grown more resilient, more integrated, and more supportive of the administration and the state in the wake of this invasion."