🔗 Share this article

Only two days prior to the NYC race for mayor, Michael Lange issued a significant electoral prediction – not just who would win overall, and precinct by precinct. Lange, a political analyst who grew up in New York City, devoted more than ten years in left-leaning activism and has become something of a local celebrity recently for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and polling.

He published his extremely precise forecast map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani was victorious while failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his Substack, the Narrative War. Lange has a flair for clever terms. He highlighted, as an example, the divide between the progressive stronghold, stretching from one neighborhood to another area to Astoria, where he forecasted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would win by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal outrank the New York Times” in readership and the majority of electors favored the independent, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Patterns and Unexpected Results

How was your night?

I had to do that since they were dropping approximately 200K votes into the tally frequently! I was actually somewhat anxious at the beginning: Mamdani was ahead the initial ballots by a dozen percentage points, but there were two big batches of votes added after that and his lead dropped from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

You know, there was a world in which yesterday went somewhat badly for him, where Cuomo was going to end up essentially doubling his votes from the earlier contest. But Mamdani added half a million supporters to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He campaigned and greatly broadened his support from the primary.

Coalition Building

How did the mayor-elect get additional support from?

He built the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, it’s young, tenants and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He improved significantly with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the earlier election. Additionally he further maximized his core of left-leaning activists, youthful radicals, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without making those significant inroads.

He built the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: multiracial, youthful, tenants and people struggling with costs

There were also a number of supporters of both candidates – is this significant?

It is a real thing, confined to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Islamic voters. Voters in ethnic enclaves that supported Trump last year backed Zohran this year. However I wouldn’t say he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Trump loyalists.

Turnout and Effects

One of the big stories of the election was the sky-high participation. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Participation was much greater than I had expected. I figured we might exceed 2 million, but it reached 2.3M – which is a lot of darn voters. Existed a substantial opposition group, energized, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that was enough to win.

You predicted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Right now it appears he’s favored to surpass 50%. He has 50.4% but remain probably 200,000 votes uncounted as of Wednesday morning. So I don’t think it’s definitive, but I believe probable, and I wish he achieves it because afterwards no one can say Sliwa was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His support plummeted.

He didn’t win any district in any area. Including Tottenville in Staten Island, which is like an highly conservative area. That really surprised me. The independent kept Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and then added many Republicans on Staten Island with a high participation. I believe occurred a lot of strategic balloting by GOP voters. They were doing it before the former president endorsed for Cuomo, but it assisted. It could have even turned the tide if the winning alliance failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your much mentioned left-wing base – was support for Mamdani overwhelming in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think there was a little dilution of the progressive zone in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. There, instance, the property owners and residents supported Cuomo. So there was a little resistance. However no, mostly the commie corridor is a key factor why Mamdani prevailed – he scored between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the election we reported on if Mamdani was gaining ground with the community. Any indication that he did?

Exist areas with a lot of non-religious and left-inclined voters – like specific locales – where he did well. But in the wealthy Jewish communities such as the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance was influential there. Likewise in the moderate communities including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they favored Cuomo. And also, there are Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in southern Brooklyn, they were strongly Cuomo. So it’s unclear if there were major surprises here, but he did hold left-leaning areas and including sections of the another locale by big margins.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York represents in politics? Will the progressive base become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Absolutely, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest figures from the left hail from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I’m sure that there will be more of that – candidates will emerge from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

However I think that every city in the US could develop their own commie corridor. Cities are the epicenters of progressive influence in America – since youth reside there, people rent and they represent locales where people are crushed by the inequalities we face.